Legal Opinion

Pack v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The assignment of error relied upon is that the Circuit Court erred in holding that the complaint filed in the Justice’s Court states facts sufficient to constitute a crime. The charging part of the complaint is as follows:

“That the said defendant, Arthur Pack, on the 26th day of January, 1925, in the County of Wasco, State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully possess and have in his possession certain peach mash, fit for distillation, and for the manufacture of spirituous intoxicating liquor contrary to the Statutes * * ”

The complaint is based upon Chapter 30,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. RosascoOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jewell Greenberry White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Karr v. MahaffayWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Grayson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API