Springfield v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co.

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

This is a deceptive trade practice case. Appellants 1 maintain that appellee 2 insurers in this case have acted in concert through the entity known as the Texas Automobile Insurance Service Office (TAI-SO) to accomplish an unlawful and unconstitutional purpose. That purpose being the “enticement” of the State Board of Insurance to adopt a policy form, Endorsement 243, which was on its face, contrary to the provisions of Article 5.06-3, 3 Texas Insurance Code, and unconstitutional pursuant to Article I, Section 28 of the Texas Constitution.

Appellants have not sought any…