Legal Opinion

Hines v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Review of the denial of relief by a single justice of this court under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is limited to whether the single justice committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion. Caggiano v. Commonwealth, 406 Mass. 1004, 1005 (1990). The petitioner has not met his burden under G. L. c. 211, § 3, to show “both a substantial claim of violation of his substantive rights and irremediable error.” Barnoski v. Commonwealth, 413 Mass. 1007, 1007 (1992), quoting Morrissette v. Commonwealth, 380 Mass. 197, 198 (1990). His petition was not accompanied by any documentation, e.g., materials from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrissette v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Hines v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Caggiano v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Pandey v. Ware Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Barnoski v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Murray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Murray v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Murray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API