Hines v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Review of the denial of relief by a single justice of this court under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is limited to whether the single justice committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion. Caggiano v. Commonwealth, 406 Mass. 1004, 1005 (1990). The petitioner has not met his burden under G. L. c. 211, § 3, to show “both a substantial claim of violation of his substantive rights and irremediable error.” Barnoski v. Commonwealth, 413 Mass. 1007, 1007 (1992), quoting Morrissette v. Commonwealth, 380 Mass. 197, 198 (1990). His petition was not accompanied by any documentation, e.g., materials from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morrissette v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Hines v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Caggiano v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Pandey v. Ware Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Barnoski v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Murray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Murray v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Murray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009