Legal Opinion

Barnoski v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 7, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by William Barnoski (petitioner) from the denial of relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1990 ed.), by a single justice of this court. We affirm.

Generally, absent clear error of law or abuse of discretion, a decision of a single justice will not be disturbed. Kyricopoulos v. Richardson, 409 Mass. 1002 (1991). For the extraordinary relief sought under G. L. c. 211, § 3, the petitioner must show “both a substantial claim of violation of his substantive rights and irremediable error, such that he cannot be placed in statu quo in the regular course of appeal.” Morrissette v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Morrissette v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Kyricopoulos v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Matthews v. D'ArcyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnoskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Campiti v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Sinai v. Plymouth Division of Probate & Family Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API