Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board) prepared a Risk Assessment Instrument (hereinafter the RAI) for the defendant which assessed points for various risk factors and rendered a total score which placed the defendant in presumptive risk level two under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see generally People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d *838112, 117-119 [2011]; Correction Law § 168-n [2], [3]). At the SORA risk level determination hearing, the County Court determined that the People established by clear…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. ChiddickNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ShimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. ManougianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. MorrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. AminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API