Legal Opinion
Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided January 7, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action in the court of common pleas for Charleston county on January 14, 1929, against the Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Company (hereinafter styled the Minnesota Company) and its agent, one R. L. Montague. The plaintiff and Montague are citizens of South Carolina, and the Minnesota Company is a citizen of Minnesota. The action is ex delicto for fraud and deceit, based on alleged false representations made by the Minnesota Company and Montague, its agent, in the sale of certain timber. The amount in dispute exceeds $3,000.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bradley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1951
- Stone v. FosterDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Rick v. HedrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1958
- Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Jolly v. General Accident GroupDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974