Poole v. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
In this case, we consider whether George Poole’s (“Appellant’s”) personal injury claim for injuries suffered when he slipped and fell on black ice was properly resolved on summary judgment based on Appellant’s alleged assumption of the risk. Based upon the record, we cannot say, as a matter of law, that Appellant had knowledge of the risk that resulted in injuries, when, in making a delivery during the course of his employment, he chose to walk through a stream of running water that flowed across a parking lot. Therefore, we hold that it was error for the trial court to resolve the question…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Heckman v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Rounds v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Apex Oil Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Thomas v. Panco Management of Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.