Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Nutmeg Plumbing Supply Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 9, 1956No. File 98411PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
This is an appeal from a finding and award of the workmen’s compensation commissioner in favor of the claimant.
No attack is made on the subordinate facts in the finding, the sole ground of appeal being that the ultimate conclusion, which is found in paragraph 12 of the finding and award, is without support in the subordinate facts. This conclusion, in effect, is that the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. In oral argument in this court, the respondent quite properly conceded that the injury arose in the course of the employment. Thus, the sole question determinative of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Taylor v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Gesmundo v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richardson v. J. Neils Lumber CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1959