Legal Opinion

Weitzel v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 2004No. 44, September Term 2004PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

In this case, we revisit the “tacit-admission” rule and the issue of the admissibility of pre-arrest silence in the presence of a law enforcement officer as substantive evidence of guilt. We shall hold that a defendant’s pre-arrest silence in police presence is inadmissable under Maryland evidence law as direct evidence of guilt.

*453I.

On March 17, 2002, police and paramedics responded to a 911 call from the Holabird East apartments in Baltimore County. They discovered Darla Effland lying unconscious and severely injured at the bottom of a public stairwell. The only other persons present were…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Marquardt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Ragland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Salinas, GenovevoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API