Andresen v. Clear Ridge Aviation, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
The defendant, as the prevailing party1 has moved for the taxation of certain items costs in the action, beyond those taxed by the clerk.2 It first tendered a motion in very general terms, but thereafter submitted its demands in itemized form in an Amended Motion (filing 30). Oral arguments have been made and briefs have been submitted upon the latter pleading; and the court now rules upon it.
Certain items claimed in the motion are obviously recoverable; and, without formal discussion, their allowance is now announced. They include:
Item I, 2, Photostatic copies,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gold Dust Corporation v. HoffenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Wallace v. HouseDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1974
- Banks v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1950
- Bowman v. West Disinfecting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.