Legal Opinion
Filz v. Mayo Foundation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 18, 1991No. Civ. No. 4-89-1087PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ Mayo Foundation and Rochester Methodist Hospital (“defendants”) appeal of an order of Magistrate Judge Floyd E. Boline dated October 2, 1990. That order denies defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff Joyce Filz (“Filz”) to sign a medical authorization permitting defendants to conduct ex parte interviews with her treating physicians. Based on a review of the file and record herein, defendants’ motion to set aside the magistrate judge’s order is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Joyce and Donald Filz bring this action alleging…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Berczyk v. Emerson Tool Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Horner v. Rowan Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- In re National Hockey League Players' Concussion Injury LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.