Legal Opinion

Branum v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2005No. 40A01-0408-JV-371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

NAJAM, Judge.

Billy Joe Branum has filed a petition for rehearing asking that we clarify our holding regarding his sentence for contempt for failure to pay child support. In particular, Branum asserts that we "failed to adequately explain that conditioning a con-temnor's release from a civil contempt jail sentence on his willingness to comply with the child support order is legally allowable only if the contemmnor has the current ability to comply with the order." Appellant's Brief on Rehearing at 1. We grant Bra-num's petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pettit v. PettitIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Branum v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marks v. TolliverIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. J.M. v. D.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Jm v. DaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API