Kruse v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant was convicted by the court, trial by jury having been waived, of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 1 At trial there was testimony by the arresting officer and a private citizen that appellant was operating an automobile from one side of the roadway to the other and that he made an improper turn. According to the officer, appellant had a very strong odor of alcohol on his breath, talked with a thick tongue, and had to be assisted to the precinct. His testimony was corroborated by another officer assigned to the cell block.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Idler v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boynton v. LopezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hart v. ChernerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Spears v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Cunningham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.