Williams v. District of Columbia

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted by the court, sitting without a jury, of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor 1 and driving through a safety zone. The chief errors alleged on this appeal are: (1) that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction, and (2) that the trial court’s decision was contrary to certain supposedly uncontradicted medical testimony.

It was conceded that appellant was operating the automobile. A police officer testified that on March 13, 1956, at about 8:45 P.M., he observed the automobile traveling south on…