Legal Opinion

Hart v. Cherner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1962No. 2897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Ronald A. Hart purchased a used 1956 Ford from the Cherner Motor Company in August 1960 and subsequently brought this action seeking to recover for breach of warranty and fraud. The case was tried to the court without a jury and a finding was entered for the Cherner Motor Company. Hart appeals, contending that the finding was contrary to the evidence and to law.

The transcript shows there were conflicts in the testimony as to what representations had been made at the time of sale, the condition of the car, the circumstances surrounding the selection of this particular…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bellevue Gardens, Inc. v. HillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  2. Kruse v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boynton v. LopezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Freas v. GitomerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. In re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Cohen v. CohenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. In re Estate of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API