Washington State Grange v. Locke
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
fl In 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Washington’s blanket primary system was unconstitutional.1 As a result, the Washington legislature was required to enact a new system for conducting primary elections in Washington, and during the 2004 session, the legislature responded by enacting Engrossed Senate Bill 6453 (ESB 6453), adopting the “Louisiana style” or “top two” primary system in Washington. ESB 6453 also allowed for implementation of a “Montana style” primary *479system as an alternative, should the Louisiana system be overturned by the courts.2 Governor Locke then vetoed…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- California Democratic Party v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- WASH. ASS'N FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Washington State Grange v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.