Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 The Washington Constitution grants the governor the power to veto individual sections of a bill. The governor may exercise this power even when doing so changes the meaning or effect of the bill from that which the legislature intended. As a corollary of this power, when the governor’s sectional veto alters the intent of the bill and the legislature does not override the veto, the governor’s veto message becomes the exclusive statement of legislative intent that speaks directly to the bill as enacted into law.
¶2 In this case, the governor vetoed over half of the sections in a 2011 bill…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ReisWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- Snohomish County v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State of Washington v. David Joseph BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.