Legal Opinion

Rocha v. Ahmad

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 30, 1984No. 04-82-00245-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESQUIVEL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an intervenor’s suit for attorney fees. Appellant/intervenor Thomas Rocha, Jr. (Rocha) sued his former clients, M.M. and Janet Ahmad (Ahmads) in intervention in a suit entitled M.M. Ahmad, et ux. Janet Ahmad v. Larry Hengst, Inc. Rocha based his cause of action on the fact that he had been the Ahmads’ attorney when the suit was filed; and that under their written contingency fee contract, the Ahmads had agreed to obtain attorney fees on his behalf from the defendant, Larry Hengst, Inc., under the provisions of the Texas Deceptive…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Woods v. LittletonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Houston v. First City, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Saffer v. WilloughbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. BlakelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Good v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API