Foster v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATTIMORE, Justice.
Appellant, George Robert Foster, was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated *287possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine of more than 28 grams, but less than 400 grams, including adulterants and dilutants, with the intent to deliver. See Tex. Health & Safety Code ANN. §§ 481.116, 481.102(6) (Vernon 1992). The jury assessed punishment at thirteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and a fine of $100.00. On appeal Foster raises two points of error contending that: (1) the evidence is not sufficient…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Runnels v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- St. Clair v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Bobby Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Donald Ray Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Jamarlon Jermaine Glenn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.