Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided April 14, 2011No. 07-10-0251-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Julie Marie St. Clair appeals the denial of her motion to suppress evidence, the evidence being a controlled substance found in her purse. She contends that the trial court erred because the purported inventory search of the car wherein the purse lay was improper. We affirm.

Background

Officer Christian Grimland (Grimland), with the Amarillo Police Department, testified that on December 14, 2008, he stopped appellant because the tag light on her vehicle was not working. Upon checking her driver’s license, the officer discovered appellant had an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Mayberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Moskey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  4. Richards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William Adrian Roberts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  2. Daniel Uballe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  3. Andrew Joseph Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  4. Andrew Joseph Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  5. Andrew Joseph Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API