Legal Opinion
Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. HQ Specialty Pharma Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 26, 2016No. Civil Action No. 13-6228 (JBS/KMW)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDACTED OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge.
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION.. .411
II. BACKGROUND.. .413
A. Factual and Procedural Background ...413
*4111. Background to Esmolol Hydrochloride and Baxter’s Innovative Esmolol Research ... 413
2. Mr. Owoo’s Separation from Baxter .. .415
3. Mr. Owoo’s Initial Contact with [¶] ...416
4. HQ’s Development Agreement with Mr. Owoo’s Welgrace Research Group ...417
5. HQ’s Applications before the USPTO and FDA ... 418
6. Litigation in this District ... 418
III. STANDARD OF REVIEW .. .419
IV. DISCUSSION.. .420
A. Baxter Cannot Establish a Prima Fa-cie Case of Tortious…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kennedy v. American Airlines Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Mylan Labs. Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC v. CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- AUSTAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. AUSTARPHARMA LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BETH LASCH VS. STUART KOPERWEIS (L-3917-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.