Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

AUSTAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. AUSTARPHARMA LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 27, 2019No. 2:19-cv-08356Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AUSTAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, . DIRECTLY AGAINST AND Civ. No. 19-8356 (KM) (MAH) DERIVATELY ON BEHALF OF AUSTARPHARMA LLC, OPINION Plaintiff, v. AUSTARPHARMA LLC, Defendant/Nominal Defendant, v. RONG LIU AND GUANGZHOU BRISTOL DRUG DELIVERY Co., LTD., Defendants. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: The complaint of plaintiff Austar International Limited (“Austar International”) asserts direct and derivative claims against AustarPharma LLC (‘AustarPharma’”), Rong Liu, and Guangzhou Bristol Drug Delivery Co., LTD. (now known as Bostal Drug…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API