Legal Opinion

Burns v. Harfst

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1953No. 32240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

This is an action for damages for injuries to an infant. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant’s demurrer to the evidence was sustained, and the action was dismissed. Plaintiff has appealed from this judgment and from the order denying a motion for a new trial.

The accident occurred about eight-thirty in the morning in a school zone in the city of Seattle. As defendant, Walter W. Harfst, drove his automobile through this zone, he observed on his right several cars parked parallel to the curb (partially on the parking strip) and one car which was parked at a sharp angle to the curb, so…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Harrison Memorial HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Ruff v. Fruit Delivery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Mulka v. KeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Wheaton v. StuckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ferguson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eden Ex Rel. Eden v. KlaasNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Johnson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Claar v. Auburn School District No. 408Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API