Legal Opinion

Liggett v. Philliber

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1943No. Civ. No. 6795Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Appellant commenced an action against respondents to recover damages for alleged false imprisonment, her complaint alleging in part that:

“. . . for many years last past plaintiff has been a widow residing with her minor son of the age of fifteen years in her home in the Town óf Davis. . . . •

“■ ■ ■ the defendants acting together and in concert, each conspiring with the other against the plaintiff with' the intent and for the purpose of causing the arrest, imprisonment and commitment to the Mendocino State Hospital of the plaintiff caused to he made and sworn to an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re LiggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Henley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. In Re WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. In Re ConmyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API