Legal Opinion

In Re Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1923No. Crim. No. 725PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J., pro tem.

Petitioner seeks his discharge on habeas corpus from imprisonment in the county jail of Solano County, alleging that his imprisonment is illegal and without any authority of law. The return to the writ shows that on June 4, 1923, an affidavit was made before the police judge of the city of Vallejo by one W. 0. Watson charging that “on June 4tli, 1923, James Warren Watson had been for a period of several weeks last past, and then and there is a person who from the inordinate use of alcoholic liquor and the influence thereof is irresponsible in his acts and insane…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Liggett v. PhilliberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API