Legal Opinion

In Re Liggett

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1921No. Crim. No. 2418PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, C. J.

The petitioner asks for a writ of habeas corpus to discharge him from detention in the Agnews State Hospital at Agnew, California, in pursuance of a commitment under section 2185c of the Political Code. He claims that his commitment is unlawful and that the proceedings are void for the reasons about to be mentioned.

The above-named section' authorizes the superior court to commit a person to said hospital for care and treatment upon finding that such person “is so far addicted to the intemperate use of narcotics or stimulants as to have lost the power of self-control, or is subject to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. People v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. PiaseckiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Matter of Easton, IncompetentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API