Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Germain v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers' Union No. 9

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1917No. 13894Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 30, 1916, favorable to the defendants, in an action for an injunction, after a trial on the merits before the court.

1DissentHolcomb, J.

(dissenting)—The good faith of the strike in this controversy is not in question.

An examination of the decree set forth in the majority opinion shows that all malevolent, intimidating, and coercive acts were enjoined. Under the terms of the decree there could be no congregating about and no intimidation, coercion, or annoyance of either employees or prospective employees or patrons of the places of business.

This case was tried on facts, and the facts and the law support the decree entered. Notwithstanding what was said in Jensen v. Cooks’ & Waiters’ Union, 39 Wash. 531, 81 Pac. 1069, 4 L. R.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. United States Smelting Co. v. ParryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gray v. Building Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Lindsay & Co. v. Montana Federation of LaborMontana Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API