Lindsay & Co. v. Montana Federation of Labor
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Yellowstone County; Sydney Pox» Judge. Action by Lindsay & Co., Limited, against the Montana Federation of Labor and others. From an order denying a motion to dissolve an injunction, defendants appeal. We cite the following cases to sustain our contention that the injunction herein should be dissolved: Tilery v. Chicago Livestock Exchange, 54 111. App. 233; Bohn Mfg. Co. v. Hollis, 54 Minn. 223, 40 Am.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Yellowstone County; Sydney Pox» Judge. Action by Lindsay & Co., Limited, against the Montana Federation of Labor and others. From an order denying a motion to dissolve an injunction, defendants appeal. We cite the following cases to sustain our contention that the injunction herein should be dissolved: Tilery v. Chicago Livestock Exchange, 54 111. App. 233; Bohn Mfg. Co. v. Hollis, 54 Minn. 223, 40 Am. St. Rep. 319, 55 N. W. 1119, 21 L. R. A. 337; Clemmitt v. Watson, 14 Ind. App. 38, 42 N. E. 367; National Protective Assn. v. Cumming, 170 N. Y. 315, 88 Am. St. Rep.…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
This action was commenced by Lindsay & Co., Limited, a domestic corporation, having its principal office or place of business at Helena, with branch offices and places of business at Billings and Great Falls, in this state, and engaged in conducting the business of wholesale fruit and produce merchants at those places, against the Montana Federation of Labor, the Yellowstone Trades and Labor Assembly, Billings Clerks’ Protective Union, certain officers of these associations, and others to secure an injunction restraining the defendants from certain acts alleged to have been committed by them…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Lisse v. Local Union No. 31California Supreme Court · 1935
- Duffy v. BUTTE TEACHERS'UNION, NUMBER 332Montana Supreme Court · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.