Legal Opinion
Baughman v. Jarl Extrusions, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided December 30, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
Twenty-two claimants denied unemployment compensation benefits by the commissioner appeal the denial which has been sustained by the Board of Review and the trial judge.1
Our review is limited to questions of law and determining whether there is material evidence to support the factual determinations of the Board of Review. T.C.A., § 50-1325(1). We reverse for reasons hereinafter discussed and remand for entry of *955an order directing the commissioner to authorize unemployment benefits in accordance with the Employment Security Law.
The facts found by the board pertinent to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ruberoid Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Totorica v. Western Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Milne Chair Co. v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Sprague & Henwood, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Williams v. Teledyne Continental Motors Aircraft ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Quincy Corp. v. AguilarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997