United States v. Landen Max Dula and Accrabond Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SAM B. HALL, Jr., District Judge:
Landen Max Dula and Accrabond Corporation were convicted by a jury of wire fraud, mail fraud, and false statements. Defendants now appeal their convictions, alleging a Brady violation, a comment on the failure of Dula to testify, and a violation of Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). Defendants also allege that the evidence was insufficient to prove Dula’s intent to defraud, and that the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial because the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. As the Brady claim is not presented in the record, it is dismissed without…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Moyosore Ismoila Segun Debowale Nuratu Lawanson, United States of America v. Moyosore IsmoilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Polanco v. City of Austin, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.