Legal Opinion

United States v. Landen Max Dula and Accrabond Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1993No. 92-7131PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM B. HALL, Jr., District Judge:

Landen Max Dula and Accrabond Corporation were convicted by a jury of wire fraud, mail fraud, and false statements. Defendants now appeal their convictions, alleging a Brady violation, a comment on the failure of Dula to testify, and a violation of Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). Defendants also allege that the evidence was insufficient to prove Dula’s intent to defraud, and that the trial court erred in denying a motion for new trial because the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. As the Brady claim is not presented in the record, it is dismissed without…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Moyosore Ismoila Segun Debowale Nuratu Lawanson, United States of America v. Moyosore IsmoilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. BermeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Polanco v. City of Austin, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API