Legal Opinion
Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. Myllykangas
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 3, 2007No. Civil No. 06-359 (DSD/SRN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon plaintiffs, motion for summary judgment and intervenor defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Based upon a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated, the court grants plaintiffs motion and denies intervenor defendant’s cross-motion as untimely.
BACKGROUND
This is an insurance coverage dispute under Minnesota law arising out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on June 21, 2004. Plaintiff Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Allstate”) commenced this declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO. v. MyllykangasDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007