Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Blatt

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1972No. Crim 20849PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT

Defendant was charged by information with two counts of possessing dangerous drugs. (Health &Saf. Code, § 11910.) She pleaded not guilty. A motion under section 1538.5 of the Penal Code, partially submitted on the transcript of the preliminary hearing, was denied. Defendant then withdrew her plea of not guilty and pleaded guilty to count II. She was sentenced to county jail for six months. Sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation for one year. Count I was dismissed. The appeal is from the judgment and order granting probation. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re ZornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Reinert v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. In Re SteinkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. LongwillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. BullwinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. KnutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. DunkelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. SoberanesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API