The Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
We have held this day in a companion case, Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc., 443 F.2d 928, that the district court was correct in determining that Laitram’s patents were valid, and that Deepsouth had infringed Claim 3 of the ’218 patent and Claim 1 of the ’927 patent. Our present problem is to decide whether Deepsouth may sell its infringing machine in foreign markets when it produces all essential parts of the machine in the United States but ships it in a form which contemplates minor final assembly in such foreign markets. We hold it may not.
35 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Radio Corporation of America v. AndreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- The Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Windsurfing International, Inc. v. Fred Ostermann GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984