Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
These are companion cases to Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co., ante, p. 661. One suit was instituted by petitioner, the other by respondent. Petitioner sought a declaratory judgment to the effect that the Freeman patent No. 1,813,732 was invalid and that petitioner did not infringe it, that respondent had used the Freeman patent in violation of the anti-trust laws, that respondent be restrained from threatening petitioner and its customers with infringement suits, that an accounting be had and treble damages awarded. Respondent in its bill sought a decree sustaining the validity…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-honeywell Regulator Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
3Cited by116 opinions
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.