Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 30, 1972No. 71-315Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Blackmun,

with whom The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Powell, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist join, dissenting.

Because our grant of certiorari was limited, 404 U. S. 1037 (1972), the customarily presented issues of patent validity and infringement are not before us in this case. I necessarily accept, therefore, the conclusion that the Laitram patents are valid and that the Deepsouth de-veining machine, when manufactured and assembled in the United States, is an infringement. The Court so concedes. The Court, however, denies Laitram patent law protection against Deepsouth’s manufacture and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Radio Corporation of America v. AndreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Radio Corporation of America v. AndreaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. The Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API