Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 16, 2017No. 13-2190, 13-2191PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEDD, Circuit Judge:

On remand from the United States Supreme Court, we are asked to consider whether the Government stated a claim under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a) against Triple Canopy, Inc. Applying Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 1989, 195 L.Ed.2d 348 (2016), we conclude that the Government properly alleged an FCA claim.

I

The facts and procedural history are recounted in detail in our earlier opinion. See United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc., 775 F.3d 628, 632-33 (4th Cir. 2015). In brief, the Government…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States ex rel. Omar Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  4. Vazquez-Valentin v. Santiago-DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Triple Canopy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. BadrSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Grant v. United Airlines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States ex rel. Folliard v. Comstor Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Marsteller ex rel. United States v. TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. ADAM JOSEPHS v. AMENTUM SERVICES INC., et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API