United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEDD, Circuit Judge:
On remand from the United States Supreme Court, we are asked to consider whether the Government stated a claim under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a) against Triple Canopy, Inc. Applying Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 1989, 195 L.Ed.2d 348 (2016), we conclude that the Government properly alleged an FCA claim.
I
The facts and procedural history are recounted in detail in our earlier opinion. See United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc., 775 F.3d 628, 632-33 (4th Cir. 2015). In brief, the Government…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States ex rel. Omar Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Vazquez-Valentin v. Santiago-DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Triple Canopy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. BadrSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States ex rel. Grant v. United Airlines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States ex rel. Folliard v. Comstor Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Marsteller ex rel. United States v. TiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- ADAM JOSEPHS v. AMENTUM SERVICES INC., et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.