State v. King
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 Gordon R. King appeals his conviction of attempted forcible sexual abuse of a child in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5^04 (1999). 1 Because we hold that the trial court failed to fully satisfy its responsibility to detect, probe, and eliminate juror bias during the jury selection process, we reverse King’s conviction and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND 2
¶ 2 King was charged with sexual abuse of a child, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404.1 (1999). 3 After a preliminary hearing, King was bound over for trial. At trial, once the prospective jurors were sworn,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.