Legal Opinion

Amend v. Bell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1977No. 44616PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This is a personal injury suit arising from an intersection collision. To get at the issues, we need to consider the pleadings. The individual defendant, who was the disfavored driver in an uncontrolled intersection, admitted in his answer that he failed to yield the right-of-way and that such was a proximate cause of the collision. He alleged that plaintiff was guilty of negligence, and/or contributory negligence, and/or comparative negligence which was a proximate cause of the collision. Defendant alleged that plaintiff driver's Volkswagen was equipped with a shoulder harness seat belt, but…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Waterson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API