Legal Opinion
City of Houston v. McDonald
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided May 1, 1997No. 14-96-00278-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order granting summaiy judgment in favor of appellee, Harold McDonald. In two points of error, appellants, the City of Houston and the Civil Service Commission of the City of Houston (collectively, the “Commission”), contend the summary judgment was improperly granted. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL STATUS
The facts of this case are undisputed. On October 11, 1993, the Commission administered promotional examinations in order to fill the position of Shop Foreman in the Houston Fire Department. McDonald was eligible for the position and took the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- At & T CORP. v. Rylander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Martin v. Harris County Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Sung Wan Jun v. Lloyds & Other Various Insurers, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Haag, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Crenshaw, Dupree & Milam, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.