Legal Opinion

At & T CORP. v. Rylander

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 26, 1999No. 03-98-00207-CVPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. WOODFIN JONES, Justice.

Appellants AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”) and AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. (“AT & T Southwest”) 1 sued the State Comptroller, appellee, 2 after the Comptroller denied the AT & T Companies’ request for a refund of certain taxes paid. Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment for the Comptroller. We will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The material facts in this case are largely undisputed. Appellants AT & T and its wholly owned subsidiary AT & T Southwest are two distinct taxpayers that are, or have been, in the business of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Taub v. Houston Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. CTTI Priesmeyer, Inc. v. K & O LTD. PARTNERSHIP, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  3. Evergreen National Indemnity Co v. Tan It All, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Poole Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Murthy v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API