Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Crenshaw, Dupree & Milam, L.L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 17, 1998No. 08-96-00411-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARAJAS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Appellee Crenshaw, Dupree & Milam, L.L.P. (“CD & M”). For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

I. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

A. Procedural History

This appeal arises from a fraud and legal malpractice claim against Appellant General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”) and CD & M. GMAC and CD & M were sued by Gordon Rose, Jean Rose, Robert Rose, Dayonne Rose, Modern Chevrolet, Inc., and Modern Hyundai, Inc., (“the Roses”) for numerous common law tort causes of action and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re McCannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Border Demolition & Environmental, Inc. v. Ernesto Pineda, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2017
  3. Business Staffing, Inc. v. Jackson Hot Oil ServiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture v. Joe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  5. Rodgers v. Weatherspoon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API