Legal Opinion

State v. Dalos

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 2001No. C6-01-261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Judge.

On appeal from a DWI conviction, appellant contests the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence. Appellant argues that the district court erred in ruling that the trooper had a reasonable articulable suspicion to stop appellant based on the time of day and her driving behavior, where appellant was driving below the speed limit and was weaving within her own lane. We affirm.

FACTS

Early one morning a highway trooper noticed a vehicle weaving within its lane. It was shortly after 2:00 a.m., and the vehicle was traveling at 45 miles per hour in a 55 mile per…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue ThorneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie MangenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  3. State of Minnesota v. Ralph Joseph ThunderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API