Zaleski v. Clark
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Assumpsit to recover the price of a plaster bust made for the defendant; being the same case in which this court granted a new trial, ante Yol. 44, p. 218. The case came again before the Court of Common Pleas, and was tried to the court upon the former plea of the general issue, before Pede, J. There had been a special finding of the facts by the court upon tlie former trial, which is given in full in the former report of the case.
Read the full summary
Assumpsit to recover the price of a plaster bust made for the defendant; being the same case in which this court granted a new trial, ante Yol. 44, p. 218. The case came again before the Court of Common Pleas, and was tried to the court upon the former plea of the general issue, before Pede, J. There had been a special finding of the facts by the court upon tlie former trial, which is given in full in the former report of the case. Upon the second trial the plaintiff’s counsel offered one Thompson as a witness to prove that the plaster bust of the defendant’s deceased husband, which he had…
1Opinion of the CourtLoomis, J.
When this, case came before this court at a former term it came up on a special finding of the facts by the Court of Common Pleas, with a judgment rendered upon those facts in favor of the plaintiff; the defendant moving for a new trial on the ground that the court erred in applying the law to the facts so found; and this court advised that a new trial be granted on that ground.
When the case came up for re-trial in the Court of Common Pleas, the plaintiff proceeded to introduce his evidence, when the defendant’s counsel objected to the evidence on the ground that the facts sought to be proved…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Magill v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Bartholomew v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
- Bradshaw v. CallaghanCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1811
- Nichols v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.