Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Metropolitan Bank
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 9, 1991No. C5-90-2067PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Kim Nichols was injured during the repossession of her automobile. Appellants commenced a claim against Metropolitan Bank, R.J. Control Service, and a R.J. Control Service’s employee for damages resulting from the unlawful repossession of the automobile. Respondent Western Surety Company was joined as a defendant on the theory a surety bond it executed for R.J. Control rendered it liable for appellants’ injuries. Appellants argue the trial court erred by granting Western Surety’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 1, 1986 respondent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Country Club Oil Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Karim v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Nelson Roofing & Contracting, Inc. v. C. W. Moore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Good v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- In Re the Claims Against the Grain Buyer's Bond No. 877706-08624237Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Claims Against the Grain Buyer's Bond No. 877706-08624237Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992