Legal Opinion
Good v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 18, 2008No. 06-CV-1027 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert B. Good, Jr. is — and plaintiff Daniel R. Miller was — an independent financial advisor affiliated with defendant Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (“Ameriprise” 1). Plaintiffs allege that Ameriprise failed to pay its financial advisors the full amount of the commissions to which they were entitled under their contracts. Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of a putative *562class of over 10,000 Ameriprise advisors, seeking damages for breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Coleman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Leslie Miedema v. Maytag CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clausnitzer v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Smith v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021