Legal Opinion

State v. Stockett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1977No. CA 6266, SC 25122PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed defendant’s conviction for arson. Defendant contended that the trial court erred in refusing to give his requested instruction on diminished intent or partial responsibility under ORS 161.305, and the Court of Appeals agreed with that contention. In doing so, the court held that the fact that the statute placed the burden of proving diminished intent on the defendant did not make the statute unconstitutional. 28 Or App 35, 558 P2d 1241 (1977). We granted review in order to consider the constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. WetmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. MainsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. StillingOregon Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API