Legal Opinion

Dickson Construction, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided February 4, 1998No. 06-97-00031-CVPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Dickson Construction, Inc. appeals an adverse summary judgment ruling in favor of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (F & D), Hibbs-Hallmark & Company (Hibbs-Hallmark), and Billy Hibbs, president of Hibbs-Hallmark. Dickson brought suit against the three defendants in the court below for business disparagement, tortious interference, and in the alternative, fraud, civil conspiracy, and breach of fiduciary duty. Additionally, Dickson sued F & D alternatively for violations of Article 21.21 of the Insurance Code and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  2. Crump v. Sabine River AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Dickson Construction, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  4. Cook v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Rogers v. Ardella Veigel Inter Vivos Trust No. 2, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API