Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. v. Baker, Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1895No. 1837PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEAD, Associate Justice.

Appellee prosecutes this suit to recover upon three policies issued by appellant, insuring the life of George W. Baker. A judgment for the 12 per cent statutory penalty, reasonable attorney’s fees, one-half the premiums paid, and $272.25 alleged to have been paid by Baker through mistake, is also asked.

Each of the policies commences with the clause, “In consideration of the application for this policy, which is hereby made a part of this contract, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of Hew York promises,” etc. Each of the applications thus made a part of the policies…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Equitable Life Insurance v. HazlewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Alstin v. CundiffTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Byers Bros. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mason v. PetersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Luckenbach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. American Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. HaggertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Kampmann v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Smith v. FrostTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API