Legal Opinion
Smith v. Frost
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1923No. 461-3266PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
The plaintiffs in error, W. H. Smith, L. Fred, Sidney Herz, the Goldstein-Migel Company, Sanger Bros., the Texas Power & Light Company, and Alex Fitzpatrick, having caused several writs of execution and attachment sued out by them against Clayton, Gordon, and Hugh Boggs, composing the firm of Boggs Bros., to be levied on an automobile, the defendant in error, C. E. Frost, delivered to the officer, who levied said writs, his oath in writing, claiming to be the owner of said property, and the officer having assessed the value of same at $1,500, defendant in error executed and delivered to him…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kilgore v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Smith v. Traders National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Ables v. DonleyTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Dashiel v. LottTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Workman v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Central Nat. Bank of Waco v. LawsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Rector v. EvansTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Silver Spur Addition Homeowners v. Clarksville Seniors ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ferguson v. American Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.