Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mena v. D'Ambrose

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1978Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Breitel

(dissenting in part). I cannot agree with the novel proposition, supported neither by statute, case law, nor sound policy, that the period during which errors in an eligible list remain uncorrected extends the duration of the list. Section 56 of the Civil Service Law imposes a four-year maximum on eligible lists, and, once that period has expired, a court may not order appointment from the list. Nor can the court approve a proposed stipulation of settlement to appoint *435from an expired list when the very party to make the appointment never agreed to the aborted stipulation. I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Cash v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Ciaccia v. Board of Education.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Brown v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API